Roger Sherman and the Creation of the American Republic - By Mark David Hall
Who is Roger
Sherman? The name sounded vaguely
familiar to me but didn't bring up any definite information in my head. I
understood that he had something important to do with the founding of our
nation. What interested me in this
book was that it appeared to be an argument against an exclusively secular
interpretation of the founding documents.
"Historians are better than
political scientists and law professors at recognizing that faith mattered to
many Americans in the founding era, but even they have a tendency to treat
America's founders as deists who embraced a rationalist approach to politics
and who embraced secular documents such as the Declaration of Independence,
Constitution, and the Bill of Rights…"
Hall points out that, when discussing the founders' views of the
separation of Church and State, people normally look at a select group of the
most famous founders. He believes that this is not the best course of
action as, "these men are not representative
of the founders as a whole."
The more I read, the
more interesting Rodger Sherman himself became to me. Sherman was the only founding father who
signed and helped create all what are probably the most important documents in the formation of America: The
Declaration and Resolves, the Declaration of Independence, The Articles of
Confederation, the Constitution, and also helped with the Bill of Rights. This book is not really a biography, though
it is biographical. Using Sherman as the primary example, the author makes a
compelling case that many of the founders were Calvinistic/Reformed or that
that was their religious background, and he demonstrates how their views of
government were impacted/formed by their religious beliefs. Hall states that, "Within a generation of Calvin, virtually every
reformed civil and ecclesiastical leader was convinced that the Bible taught
that governments should be limited, that they should be based on the consent of
the governed, that rulers should promote the common good and the Christian
faith, and that unjust or ungodly rulers should be resisted or even
overthrown." It is observed that this political Calvinism
was more influenced by Theodore Beza and David Pareus than John Calvin.
Sherman did not
believe that he was disobeying God by going against England, being "convinced from a relatively early date that
Parliament's constitutional authority extended only to geographical areas
represented in the body." Having
no representation in that governing body, he believed that colonies were their
own governments. And as the King was not
doing his duty of protecting them, he believed that they were not obligated to
remain loyal to him. When it came to the
formation of a new government, he believed that man was innately sinful, not
basically good, and so was for limited government with checks and balances, and
was very much for states' self-government in the making of the United States. It was very interesting to read about some of
the debates that took place in the drafting of our ruling documents. Sherman
and other 'Reformed' Founders were significant participants in the founding of our nation, and so deserve more
attention in our examination of its principal documents. Hall makes the
significant point that "Sherman, like
Thomas Jefferson, authored a significant state law concerning religious
liberty, and, unlike Jefferson, he participated in debates on the First
Amendment. It is therefore striking that
when Supreme Court justices have used history to interpret the First
Amendment's religion clauses, they have made 112 distinct references to
Jefferson but have mentioned Sherman only three times."
This book was well
written and, in a way, riveting. It was
very exciting to learn of what type of men God used to form the United States
of America. Even though it was more of an
overview and not very long, Hall does a great job of making a good argument in
a small space. On a side note, I was
fascinated to discover that Jonathan Edwards Jr. (son of sr.) became Sherman's
pastor, and that Sherman "remained
supportive of Jonathan Edwards Jr. after most of his church abandoned
him."
I highly recommend
this book to those interested in the history of the U. S. A. To end this review, here is one more quote
from the book:
"Like their descendants, Puritans were concerned with
"liberty", but it is critical to recognize that they never understood
the concept to include the excessively individualistic idea that men and women
are free to do anything except physically harm others. They distinguished between liberty and
personal license. Puritans were
primarily interested with freedom from sin, but they also understood liberty
as the ability of a people to govern themselves and to do what God requires of
them."
Many thanks to Oxford University Press for sending me a free review copy of this book(My review did not have to be favorable).
Comments
Post a Comment