Reasons For Belief - By Norman Geisler and Patty Tunnicliffe
"Every truth claim is narrow. Why?
Because truth itself is narrow.
If you jump off a tall building with no ability to remain aloft, you
will fall to the ground, yet no one would say belief in the law of gravity is
being narrow-minded." The
authors of this book are very good at demonstrating the exclusiveness of truth,
and our need to know the 'true-truth'.
Answering 10 questions about Christianity, the authors build their
argument, 'closing in' on the truth as the book moves on. Starting very basic, they demonstrate the
logic of there being truth and that truth must be exclusive. Then, after pointing out the obviousness of
the existence of a god, they narrow down to what god that is and if there is only
one. The rest of the book demonstrates
that the God who exists is the God of the Old and New Testaments and upholds
those Scriptures as the truth by answering questions about their composition
and content.
This book includes
several charts comparing the beliefs of world religions to Christianity, and
critiques several of the major religions.
Here are some of the authors' statements on Pantheism: "The
Designer is not the design anymore than painter is the painting",
"...pantheists believe we can become God.
But we had a beginning; God did not.
How can people who had a beginning become the One who never began? Pantheists believe that they can (by
enlightenment) become God. But God has
always known he is God. Anyone who
suddenly realizes "I am God," isn't God." The content of the Bible is used as the
ultimate proof of God being God and I love that much attention is paid to
whether or not Jesus is God. Lots of
Scriptures are used to demonstrate that Jesus was God, and that you can't
reject that reality without contradicting Him.
They show that belief in a god is not enough, belief in The God of the
Bible and belief of what God says in His word is shown to be crucial for all
people.
I only gave this
book four stars because I have found that the authors are apparently 'Old-earth
Creationists'. Using statements like,
"If the universe had expanded faster than
it did, no planets could have formed. If
no planets could form, there would be no earth." Its not too explicit, they don't go into how
much time the word 'day' is describing is in Genesis one, but it is implied
that a day is a LOT longer than a day.
Later on, when they are talking about the existence of miracles, they
state that "A genuine miracle happens
instantly - not over a period of time."
So when God said, "Let there be light", was there
light? Or when God spoke the sun and the
moon and the stars into existence, was it so? Or did it take a long period of
time, longer than an evening and a morning, one day(Genesis 1: 19)? This is why I don't know that I would
recommend the book to non-Christians, as this might encourage them to not take
the Beginning literally and so they may not take other narrative accounts in
the Bible literally.
Thanks to Bethany
House Publishers for giving me a free copy of this book in exchange for my
review(which does not have to be favorable)
Comments
Post a Comment