CSB Worldview Study Bible - Navy Leathertouch
The Worldview Study
Bible seeks to remind Christians that the Bible is not just a book that we read
to feel more religious, we are changed by it, our thinking, our worldview, our
perspective of everything is changed when we use it to renew our mind.
This Bible has many
articles in it, scattered throughout and dealing with various 'worldview'
topics, articles like: "Biblical Models for Business", "Engaging
LGBT Advocates", "Emperor and King Worship in Biblical Times", "Animal
Rights" , "A Biblical Assessment of Abortion", and so on. Some of the articles are quite interesting
and helpful. Others, I had some trouble
with some of the content. For instance,
in the article on "Biblical Formation", dealing with various ways one can utilize the
Scriptures, it says, "Praying through the
Bible flows naturally from Scripture meditation. Giants of the faith, such as Martin Luther,
Charles Spurgeon, and especially George Mueller, made a habit of praying
through Scripture…..Praying the Scriptures helps to assure that one's prayers
are biblically sound and pleasing to God."
I think that if praying through the Scriptures
was a way to pray correctly, then Christ would have told the disciples to grab
some copies of portions of the Old Testament and pray them. He could have
demonstrated by quoting one of the Psalms, or a passage of Isaiah. But instead he gave them a model prayer. How does one pray through the book of
Leviticus? Or Judges? Should we pray the imprecatory songs, while thinking of a
particular person who hates us when we are told in the New Testament to
"Love our enemies"? How would
we know that the Scripture we are praying is the right scripture for us to be
praying at that moment? The Apostle Paul
shows us that it is already assumed that we will have trouble praying
biblically sound prayers, that we do not know how to pray correctly, but that's
where the Holy Spirit comes in, "And in
like manner the Spirit also helpeth our infirmity: for we know not how to pray
as we ought; but the Spirit himself maketh intercession for us with groanings
which cannot be uttered;"(Rom 8:26) The Spirit wouldn't need to
intercede for us if we already knew how to pray as we ought, and the Bible
doesn’t say that we ever will get to a point where we know how to pray
correctly, this side of eternity. That's
where our Helper comes in.
And then, there is
an article that seems to downplay the validity of Christian young earth
creationists arguing with Christian old earth creationists, as if they should
focus on arguing their common enemy (atheistic evolutionists) rather than
debate the validity of each other's hermeneutic. But don't we remember that bad
doctrine will most likely come from within the "church"? Aren't we to look out for our brethren and
correct them in a fault? Aren't we judging those within the church, see 1 Cor
5:12 (I know, that passage is dealing with practical moral sins, not
necessarily bad viewpoints, but its implications may apply here as well),
aren't we critiquing the viewpoints of those within our midst, making sure that
we all have an accurate view of God's Word? We don't expect the world to listen
to us, we don't expect the world to ever have a correct viewpoint, but we do
want to help our brethren, fellow Christians, stay away from dangerous
hermeneutics. We are our brother's
keeper.
This Bible also has
a good deal of commentary. A lot of it
seems pretty useful, and using a literal grammatical historical
hermeneutic. For instance, in the
commentary on Jeremiah 29:11 it says, ""While it is true that from an eternal perspective God
has good plans for believers (Ps 84:11; Rm 828), this of cited verse should be
understood first with respect to its addressees; exiles who would have to wait
an extended time for God to restore them…"
But the hermeneutic seems to
change in spots, like in Revelation, where it speaks of the 144,000, "The
number 144,000, with multiples of twelve and multiples of ten (completeness),
is symbolic of the entire people of God.
That the tribe of Dan is missing while Joseph as well as Manassah
(Joseph's son) are listed further supports the symbolic nature of the
list." Huh? How do those
things clue us in to this section's not being literal? The context would seem to indicate that it
should most certainly be taken literally. After the description of these
tribes, the VERY NEXT verse says, "After this I looked, and there was a vast multitude
from every nation, tribe, people, and language, which no one could
number". Differentiating
this group of many peoples from the sealed of the twelve tribes of Israel. How much clearer, could it be? It differentiates between those in Christ who
were sealed from Israel, and points out a more inclusive group later on,
encompassing all peoples? How much
clearer could John get in describing what he saw? Does he have to go through
each tribe and say, "And I heard the number of the sealed, 144,000,
sealed from every tribe of the sons of Israel: 12,000 from the tribe of Judah
were sealed, Judah was the son of Jacob (also called Israel), the son of Isaac,
the son of Abraham, born in the year such and such. The tribe of Judah was made up of all of the
living descendants of Judah. The first
descendant's name was George, the second, Robert…..the 12,000th, Charles. And I also saw that their physical features
resembled Judah's. 12,000 from the tribe
of Reuben were sealed, Reuben was the son of Jacob (also called Israel), the
son of Isaac…." Would that make it more likely to be literal? I suspect that some would think that the more
detailed it gets, the more figurative it is.
Omissions and replacements of tribes does not mean that this is not to
be taken literally, it probably should be taken VERY literally and the omission
of Dan might be significant in some way, taken as such. We shouldn't assume that the omission of one
of the original tribes indicates that this is not Israel. Why would God HAVE to choose men from the
tribe of Dan to be sealed in order for this to be literal, ethnic Israel? Do we
not remember what Paul tells us in Romans 9?
Not all Israel is Israel, and that God has the right to choose whomever
He wishes within Israel (even individual tribes).
This
"Worldview" Bible has a lot of good notes, and some interesting
essays, I just don't like some of the concepts in the essays, nor do I like the
inconsistency in the hermeneutics. Also,
the essays scattered throughout seem a bit too distracting. I think that if you are going to put multiple
essays in a Bible it would be better to put them at the end of the book, and
then you can just look up the page number in the index if you want to read a
particular article, instead of it breaking up the text.
This particular
study Bible is okay but not great.
Many thanks to the folks at B&H publishers for
sending me a free review copy of this Bible! My review did not have to be
favorable.
My Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars
***
This Bible may be purchased at Christianbook.com and at Amazon.com
Comments
Post a Comment