365 Classic Bedtime Bible Stories
I became interested
in reviewing this book when I saw a preview of it online. 365 Classic Bedtime Bible Stories (inspired
by Jesse Lyman Hurlbut's Story of the Bible) illustrated by Alessia Girasole is
geared towards children ages 3 and up and, from what I saw in the preview text
online, it looked like it might be a pretty good resource to have for teaching
kids.
Upon first examining
the book I was very pleased to see that they didn't seem to be trying to cut
out the more gruesome and sad parts of the Bible. Some of it struck me as sadly amusing, mainly
because of the illustrations. To give an
example, one of the 'stories' gives the account of the 'scoffing' nobleman who
didn't believe Elisha when he said that food would be sold at extremely low
prices the following day (there was a severe famine in the land).
The nobleman died the following day from being
trampled by people rushing toward the food.
This is illustrated (bloodlessly) in the picture accompanying the story. It amused me because the pictures in the book
are rather 'cutsey' looking cartoons and are geared more for very young
children and here is this illustration of a man being trampled by a bunch of
people! It also struck me funny because the back of this book describes it as
being a way to make "bedtime reading a
delightful learning and faith-building experience for both you and your
kids."
One of those
'delightful' stories happens to be one that ends with that ends in this way: "He was knocked to the ground by the crowd and
crushed to death." Sweet
dreams kids! Just kidding. It's good for
kids to learn the truth, and it will probably be a good discussion starter
about belief in what God says, assuming that you want a discussion started at
bedtime. Or you could just read the next
two stories after that. I say two
because if you are reading on, in order to end on a happier note, you won't want
to end on the next story either as it ends with a man being smothered! An illustration is provided for that one as
well though it only shows the man ABOUT to be smothered, not in the process of
being smothered (if that's any comfort!).
Sadly, though, there
were several exceptions to their accurate accounts of events in the Bible. I'll
give three examples:
1. The sections that
give the account of Gideon's life end with the statement, "There were, at different times, fifteen judges
over Israel. But of them all, Gideon had
the most wisdom, courage, and faith."
Where did they get that from? Do they even remember what happened
later in Gideon's life? Gideon requested that people give him gold, "And Gideon made an ephod thereof, and put it in
his city, even in Ophrah: and all Israel played the harlot after it there; and
it became a snare unto Gideon, and to his house. "(Jdg 8:27) That doesn't give the impression that Gideon
was even close to being the best judge of Israel.
2. When speaking of
the account of David and Bathsheba, this book says that when David saw her "He loved her and wanted her to be his wife"
and so he had her husband Uriah killed.
No… David committed adultery with Bathsheba before having her husband
killed and he apparently had no intention of taking Bathsheba for his own wife
until he had learned that she was pregnant and couldn't set things up to make
it seem as though Uriah was the father. That's when he had Uriah killed. The people who put this together didn't have
to go into great detail of course, but they didn't have to resort to giving
inaccurate Biblical history.
3. The same with the
account of Saul in the cave. This book
says that he rested in the gave while David and his men were hiding in there
(it even has a picture of Saul wrapped in a blanket sleeping in the cave), and
that David cut a corner of Saul's robe while he was sleeping. But, that of course was not what Saul was
doing. They could have said that he was
"using the bathroom" or "relieving himself" and let parents
do the explaining. Or they could have
just said that he was in a cave. But say that the Scriptures say something that
they did not say!
One more thing, and
this is somewhat minor, the words used in the book could have been dumbed down
a bit more, down to the level of a
little kid's intellect. Instead of
saying, "He remained there", they could have said, "He stayed
there." Or Instead of "He
wept", they could have said "He cried" and so on. Not only would it make it easier for little
kids to understand but it would make it more consistent with other parts of the
book where they actually did change it to more modern vernacular. They
used statements like, "It was stinky", "Come on" and
"You're phonies!". So why do
that with only some of the text and yet leave others that are easily changed to
something simpler?
The pictures are
interesting and kids like looking at them (a couple of my little brothers seem
to like them), they generally fit well with the stories. though not all of them
are accurate. I'm pretty sure that Aaron
should be illustrated as being older than Moses, not younger (Moses has grey
hair and Aaron has brown hair in this book).
I mainly wish that they had chosen not to depict Christ in the
illustrations, or at least not to show His face. That would be more respectful. Instead they make Him look like a European
man with long hair.
Overall, though, the
people who put this book together seem to have done a pretty good job in many
of the 'stories' they recount, sticking closely to the text of the Bible in
their summaries. My little brother enjoyed
listening to some of it and talking about the pictures. Just be ready to read it with scrutiny, and
with verbal criticism and explanation to make sure that your kids are getting
accurate information.
I received a complimentary copy of this book from
Barbour Publishing and was under no obligation to post a review
My Rating: 3 out of 5 Stars
***
This book may be purchased at Amazon.com and at Christianbook.com
Comments
Post a Comment