Saving the Bible From Ourselves: Learning to Live and Read the Bible Well - By Glenn R. Pauuw
Saving the Bible
From Ourselves by Glenn R. Pauuw is a book about people's misuse of the Bible,
how it has come to be used as a book that is a collection of isolated
propositional statements that are written specifically for me and for my
special encouragement. Overall this book
is argument against those views of the Bible (it critiques other views as well) and I believe it is a
rather good argument. I mainly listed
those two things because they are the things that captivated me most in this
book. Then I will give my critique.
First, Pauuw does an
excellent job at attacking the rather modern approach to the Bible that takes
the form of hunting for individual verses that seem relevant to us, "…find the fragments you need at the moment. If you are looking for your daily
inspiration, then find a devotional fragment.
If you are arguing with the local heretic, find a doctrinal
fragment. If you are facing an ethical
question, find a moral fragment. They're
all in there, already neatly numbered for you.
You just have to find the good ones." He makes a good case
that part of what instigated this fragmentary approach was the addition of
verse numbers and chapters to the text of the Bible.
Second, and very
much related to the first, is Pauuw's critique of our use of the Bible as
though it were written directly to us personally (or at least the comforting
parts and the parts that we like, the curses…not so much). Pauuw
demolishes the perspective that we can make ourselves the authority in
discerning what we need from the Bible, and he demonstrates that we should
trust the wisdom and sovereignty of God in His design of His own Word, and that
means the WHOLE Word of God. To use the
author's own words: "How can the Bible
possibly lead and direct our lives if we are the ones who predetermine which
parts of it speak to us? Fragmentary
patters of reading entail a fragmented sense of authority." Perhaps my favorite part in the whole book is
where Pauuw presents the "Parallel -Universe Bible" where he
demonstrates what would happen if we used verses that we do not find so
applicable to ourselves in the same way that we use our favorite verses, that
are often taken out of context, to apply directly to ourselves (for instance:
everyone likes Jeremiah 29:11 but what about Deut. 28:29?). I found that part absolutely hilarious (I was
almost crying I was laughing so hard) but very clear in the point that is being
made.
So why did I only
rate this book at 3 stars (out of 5)? Well, for one thing there were a bunch of
statements and descriptions of things that were too…I don't
know…"mystical" might be the right term. Perhaps it was just me, but some of the way
things were phrased seemed just plain weird to me (and I didn't necessarily
understand it all). He talked about
things like "Story" or "Chaos". Another thing was that
Pauuw approached (in my opinion) irreverence in how he spoke of God, in
statements like: "God was willing to take a
great risk with the Bible: He left it in our hands…" and, ""To enter history really is to give it a go in
the rough-and tumble. Even for
God." Those were just some
of the things that bothered me about this book. There was a lot to be gleaned in it but was
interspersed throughout the bothersome thing, and so ironically (having in mind
Pauuw's excellent critique of the 'snacking Bible), if I ever read this book again
I would read it in a 'snacking' sort of way.
That is why I only gave it three stars.
But on the other hand Paauw made a good (and convicting) case for
reading the whole Bible rather than just fragments of it. I'll end with quoting an excerpt that I
really liked (there were several that I liked):
"Snacking (on isolated Bible fragments) hides things to be sure, but it also distorts the
things it does show us. For example,
,the Snacking Bible is not great news. It has gospel verses, but no gospel,
because the gospel is the announcement of a particular turn of events within an
ongoing story. The gospel is not a
sentence about justification by faith or a verse reference on the forgiveness
of my sins. The gospel is not the Romans
Road. The gospel is not John 3:16. What the apostles Paul and John wrote - what
God's Spirit enkindled in them - was something entirely different than these
boiled-down reductions. Evangelist D. L.
Moody said he could write the gospel on a dime.
Well, Paul and John couldn't, and didn't."
Many thanks to the folks at InterVarsity Press for
sending me a free review copy of this book to review (My review did not have to
be favorable)
This book may be purchased (among other places) at Amazon and Christian Book Distributors
Comments
Post a Comment