Fool's Talk: Recovering the Art of Christian Persuasion - Os Guinness
Fool's Talk: Recovering the Art of Christian Persuasion by
Os Guinness is quite a convicting book, a book that really makes you think about how serious we really are about
evangelism/apologetics. It provokes the
question: how much thought do we really
put in our conversations (or even our small-talk) with unbelievers? Do we hold back on saying anything related to
the Gospel because we are ashamed of being considered foolish because of our
belief in God's Word? Or if we do
evangelize, are we just sticking with simple pre-contrived evangelization
questions like, "If you were to die today and stood before God and He
asked you why He should let you into Heaven, what would you say?" Are we willing to truly put thought into persuading
someone of the truth of Christianity, giving answers to their questions, and
asking thought-provoking questions ourselves, rather than merely turning to
someone else's pre-designed method of evangelism. Do we not seriously think of persuasion
outside of some other persons pre-written evangelization answers/questions
(though not outside the word of God)?
And are we loving when we talk to others, truly more concerned about
winning the person rather than just winning an argument?
Many thanks to the folks at InterVarsity Press for sending me a free review copy of this book! (My review did not have to be favorable)
One of the places where this book may be purchased is Amazon.com
This book's author
does an excellent job at making one think about the answers to questions like
the above. For instance, as evinced
above, he critiques modern-day evangelism, and makes the case that the 'method'
used to evangelize actually does matter, "Recent
forms of evangelism are modeled on handbooks for effective sales
technique…After all, if all truth is God's truth, it is surely legitimate to
use the best tricks of the trade, but this time use them in the service of the
truth." "Not so…" Guinness answers. "…The Lord's work must always be done in the
Lord's way. The method must serve the
message. Technique is never
neutral. It can be positive and useful,
and it can also be harmful. Sometimes it
an even be so brilliantly effective that its danger lies in its weaning us away
from needing God at all. True apologetics
is the art of truth, and its art must be shaped by the distinctiveness of the
truth it proclaims."
He also does an
excellent job at keeping one's perspective straight, because, though we do want
to persuade others as best we can, and as Scripturally as we can, we are not to have the posture of winning
discussions with non-believers at all-costs, the truth is true even if we do
not defend it well, or even if we don't have answer to a certain question. Not matter how good are argument is, God is
ultimately the only One who can change a person's heart and give them faith,
though we do hope to have the opportunity to be used of God in helping others
see the truth of the Gospel, "Faith's
certainty lies elsewhere than in the rapier sharp logic or the sledgehammer
power of the apologist. At the end of
the day, full certainty comes from the conviction of the Holy Spirit."
There were some
things in the book that had I had trouble with though. At one point the author says, "The next time you see Auguste Rodin's Thinker look at it closely" Ummm…. Sorry but if that work of 'art'
is what I think it is (an unclothed statue of a man…who is in the process of
thinking…probably trying to figure out what he forgot to do that day, he forgot
to put on clothes!) I think that then next time I see it I'll look away
quickly! I don't care if it doesn't show
anything really inappropriate, it's the implication of nakedness that bothers
me. Naked statues don't fit the list of attributes the Apostle Paul gives as to what
we should think on/meditate on in Philippians 4:8, "Finally, brethren, whatsoever things
are true, whatsoever things are honorable, whatsoever things are just,
whatsoever things are pure…(ASV)"etc.
Also, I really have
trouble with some of Guinness's statements…I was really shocked by some in
particular, "Just so did God shame the
world's folly, subvert the world's pride and put death to death through the
death of his Son. And the sober truth is
surely that this was the way, the only way that it had to be done. There was no other way. God is always able to respond to sin and
defiance with power….Power, however, usually overcomes by destroying what
defies it. Thus, as Reinhold Niebuhr
insisted, there is a limit to what even the power of God can do as power alone,
for 'such power does not reach the heart of the rebel.' Power can fence us in, but only sacrificial
love can find us out. Power can win when
we are ranged against it, but it cannot win us." That REALLY takes away the miracle of
Christians being made by God into New Creations, their hearts of stone that
couldn't love God being made, by God, into hearts of flesh that love Him and
His ways. That's power, being used
because of God's love yes, but it's His transforming power just the same! If
God didn't use power to change our hearts to love Him, and give us faith, we would not believe in
Him, nor would we wish to follow His ways! See
Colossians 2:8-16, that's not just love, that's God's power! He acts with His power because of His love
for us! Just as God will do with the
nation of Israel in the future (see Ezek. 36)
Some parts of the
book get a bit tedious as you get more into it, but overall, I liked the book,
and think that it is a good resource for helping us give thought about the
answer we should always be ready to give when asked about the hope that we have
(1 Pet. 3:15). I'll end with one of my
favorite quotes from the book:
"To follow Jesus is to pay the cost of
discipleship, and then to die to ourselves, to our own interests, our own
agendas and reputations. It is to pick
up our crosses and count the cost of losing all that contradicts his will and
way - including our reputations before the world and our standing with the
people and communities we once held dear.
It is to live before one audience, the audience of One, and therefore to
die to all other conflicting opinions and assessments. There is no room here for such contemporary
ideas as the looking-glass self; and no consideration here for trivial
contemporary obsessions such as one's legacy…"
Many thanks to the folks at InterVarsity Press for sending me a free review copy of this book! (My review did not have to be favorable)
One of the places where this book may be purchased is Amazon.com
Comments
Post a Comment