The New Answers Book 4 - Edited by Ken Ham (General Editor)
http://www.nlpg.com/the-new-answers-book-4 |
The New Answers book
4 by Ken Ham(editor) and many others, is full of chapters dealing with questions in regards to 'issues' that may
come up in discussions about Creation, and is also great for simply perusing
possible answers as to how certain things about Creation week might be explained. It is a compilation of several essays on
various aspects of Creation written by several different people who are biased
towards the Bible. The nice thing is
that they do not make having answers to every question imperative, such as the
chapters on Starlight. They make some
suggestions as to how starlight could have been visible from earth immediately
at Creation but make it clear that we don't have to know how, faith in what God's Word says is what is
important, whether or not we understand it all.
As one of the contributors wrote, "Interpretations
of Scripture are Not Scripture….Keep in mind that it is the text that is
inspired, not our interpretations of it."
Keep in mind that
this is book 4 in the New Answers series so if you have questions that are not
addressed in this volume they may be in the other books in this series. I have
not read the other ones but, based on what this one is like, I believe that I
can highly recommend all of them as they seem very biased towards what God says
happened at Creation. I love that type
of bias!!!
I'll end with an excerpt from the beginning of
the book:
"As soon as you surrender the Bible's authority in one area, you
'unlock a door' to do the same thing in other areas. Once the door of compromise is open, even if
ajar just a little, subsequent generation push the door open wider. Ultimately, this compromise has been a major
contributing factor in the loss of biblical authority in our Western world….…If
one uses fallible dating methods to reinterpret Genesis (e.g., the days of
creation), then one is 'unlocking a door,' so to speak, to teach others that
they won't have to take the Bible as written (e.g., Genesis is historical
narrative) a the beginning so why should one take it as written elsewhere
(e.g., the bodily Resurrection of Christ).
If one has to accept what secular scientists say about the age of the
earth, evolution, etc., then why not reinterpret the Resurrection of Christ? After all, no secular scientist accepts that
a human being can be raised from the dead, so maybe the Resurrection should be
reinterpreted to mean just 'spiritual resurrection'."
This book may be purchased from New Leaf Publishers , Christianbook.com and on Amazon.com
Other Reviews of the book: http://nlpgblogs.com/nab4/
Also see GoodReads Page
Comments
Post a Comment