From God to Us- How We Got Our Bible - By Norman Geisler and William Nix
This is an excellent
look into the transmission of God's Word.
Instead of starting out with material proofs or by appealing to ones
feelings regarding the inspiration of the Bible, Geisler and Nix hold the Holy Scriptures as
the ultimate authority and use the Bible as the main and first proof of its own
inspiration and authenticity. Their
method reminds me of a quote I read once that went something along these lines:
"The Scriptures revolve on their own
axis. They do not disdain indirect
assistance, from secular investigations; but they mainly depend on their own
inexhaustible resources and treasures."(E. W. Grinfield) The authors of this examination use the
prophets and apostles own references and quotations of each others God given
Scriptures as evidence. And in regards
to the Old and New Testaments they use Christ's quoting and referencing it as
special proof. They first emphasize
belief in the God of the Bible and in Jesus' divinity, and then demonstrate
that Christ's usage of Scripture as God's Word leads to a logical imperative
conclusion that the Scriptures are therefore the Word of God. "Jesus
said, 'Scripture cannot be broken' (John 10:35). On numerous occasions our Lord
appealed to the written Word of God as final arbitrator for faith and
practice. He claimed Scripture as His
authority for cleansing the temple(Mark 11:17), for rebuking the tradition of
Pharisees(Matt. 15:3, 4);.. for settling doctrinal disputes(Matt.
22:29).."
After letting the
God's Word be its own proof, the authors then move on to secondary matters,
other logical reasons as to the Bible being the truth. I like that with these secondary proofs, such
as Archaeological evidence supporting the Bibles claims, the authors make sure
to point out that this evidence is merely supporting evidence, this evidence
does not make the Bible true, the Bible is true regardless. This is the same way they treat the
development of the Canon, "Canonicity is
determined by God and discovered by man." The Words of God are
inspired whether or not man has come to the conclusion that they are
inspired. I like those points.
Moving on to the
development of the Canon, the collection of books that we hold as God's Word,
they then look into its transmission and translations down through the
centuries. This is not a high level
overview of the Bible, it is an intricate look at how God has chosen to
preserve and compile His Word by means of human beings copying, translating,
and collecting it, examining older copies of it
and collating its
manuscripts. It gets quite
detailed about the various old manuscripts of the Old and New Testaments we have to work from. But I found those details very
interesting. Also, Geisler and Nix keep
repeating what various manuscript symbols mean, they don't just assume you'll
remember them after merely seeing them one time. And having short-term memory I appreciate
that.
Now as I say(or at least think) with regards
to any book I have read besides the Bible, there are things that I do not agree
with in this book, but overall it was very informative. Speaking of not completely agreeing with any
other book, the quote I want to end with from this one fits very well:
"No article of faith may be based on any
noncanonical work, regardless of its religious value.
The
divinely inspired and authoritative books are the sole basis for doctrine and
practice. Whatever complimentary support
canonical truth derives from other books, it in no way lends canonical value to
those books. The support is purely
historical and has no authoritative theological value. The truth of inspired Scripture alone is the
canon or foundation of the truths of faith."
I received a copy of
this book from the publisher for the purpose of this
review. Thanks MoodyPublishers!
Comments
Post a Comment